Thursday, March 2, 2023

WHAT WIKIPEDIA, SCIENCE AND RELIGION GET WRONG ABOUT SCRYING part 2 THE STUPIDITY OF MODERN SCIENCE

In this extraordinary Emerge Art we see water and light reacting to the words behind the bowl, The Land Of The Dead. It is an image that belongs to the series of Emerge Art I did in January 2014 that changed my life. That is when I observed for the first time that whatever was creating the images reacted to words and books. There is a lot going on in this image but mainly, if you look closer, what is featured is the Grim Reaper pulling off masks from individuals. As the mask is removed, water, we are more than 75% water, returns to the source. ALL PHOTOS © Lena Ghio

FRANÇAIS app de traduction à gauche

In this article I am sharing one of my conversation with ChatGBT about the double standard that exists in the academic world when it doesn't fit their program. I use the subjects of dark energy and dark matter to make my point. I will highlight the relevant points.

Once I knew that water responded to words and books, I wanted to see what it would say about the historical figure Napoleon Bonaparte. This image was the most revealing. I interpret it this way: (see figure b below) a tiny man (tiny figure inside the mask top left inside the bowl, figure b) wears a big mask (figure a) in the human living world. The mask is off, therefore, he is dead.  ALL PHOTOS © Lena Ghio,

me - how do scientists hope to use dark energy?

ChatGBT - « Currently, scientists do not have any practical use for dark energy. Its discovery(?) was a surprise and it is still not well understood. Dark energy is an enigmatic concept that seems to be accelerating the expansion of the universe, but its true nature remains a mystery. Some scientists are trying to find ways to better understand dark energy through observational and experimental studies, but any potential practical application of this knowledge is still far off in the future, if there is any. However, understanding dark energy is an important part of advancing our knowledge of the universe and how it functions. »

me - If dark energy is not proven, what did scientists discover?

ChatGBT - « Dark energy is a theoretical concept that has not yet been proven directly, but rather inferred from observations of the universe's expansion. In the late 1990s, two independent teams of astronomers studying distant supernovae discovered that the expansion of the universe was actually accelerating, rather than slowing down as previously thought. This discovery suggested that something was causing the universe to expand at an accelerating rate, and the most popular explanation is the presence of dark energy.

Scientists have also discovered the effects of dark matter, which is also a hypothetical form of matter that does not emit, absorb or reflect light, and is therefore invisible. Its presence can only be inferred from its gravitational effects on visible matter. Dark matter is thought to make up approximately 85% of the matter in the universe, and its gravitational effects can be seen on a cosmic scale, such as in the movement of galaxies and galaxy clusters. »

The Grim Reaper / ALL PHOTOS © Lena Ghio

me - In which field of science does the study of dark energy and dark matter fall?

ChatGBT - « The study of dark energy and dark matter falls within the field of astrophysics and cosmology. Astrophysicists and cosmologists study the universe on a large scale, examining the properties and behaviour of celestial objects, as well as the structure and evolution of the universe as a whole. Dark matter and dark energy are important components of the universe and their study is crucial in understanding the large-scale structure and evolution of the universe. »


figure a / ALL PHOTOS © Lena Ghio

Now we get to the meat of my argument. I am not disagreeing with the science of dark energy and dark matter. My argument is that they have not PROVEN dark energy and dark matter, they are INFERRING their existence. MEANWHILE, I am providing PROOF that is verifiable that Emerge Art is based on real scrying phenomena.

Final question:

me - how does science view scrying?

ChatGBT - « Scrying is not considered a scientific practice, as it involves the use of subjective experiences and interpretation of symbols rather than objective data and evidence. Science seeks to understand the universe through empirical observations, hypothesis testing, and experimentation. However, some scientists may be interested in studying scrying from a psychological or anthropological perspective, as it is a cultural and historical phenomenon. »

Have you noticed that ChatGBT's reply wants to frame scrying as some abstract imaginary thing BUT astrophysicists who "infer" dark energy and dark matter, that has not been proven, THEY! are scientists and objective! And that is my point! I PROVIDE EVIDENCE!!!!

I don't find it very logical that science ignores evidence of such a meaningful phenomena as scrying. My next conversation with ChatGBT investigates scrying and the origins of language.

LENA GHIO   

figure b / ALL PHOTOS © Lena Ghio

No comments:

Post a Comment