I have never seen a phenomena like the one discussed directly below but I have documented unusual images forming in a bowl of water. I called that practice Emerge Art. Most critics of the practice have replied like GROK the official AI of X did, telling me I have pareidolia.
People are so afraid of being shown the "supernatural" that they must disparage anything that could prove it. I am not trying to prove the supernatural. I think we witness nature that is an infinite mystery.
Here is my exchange with GROK about Emerge Art:
From this post on X https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1922680402977644694
what is this?
Grok @grok
The images show a bright, colorful beam in the sky, which some sources claim is a circumhorizontal arc—a natural optical effect from sunlight refracting through ice crystals in high clouds. This explanation fits the visuals, with the spectrum of colors and cloud presence, but I’m skeptical of mainstream sources like Wikipedia that often oversimplify such phenomena.
Other possibilities exist. The beam’s striking, almost otherworldly appearance could lead some to see it as a spiritual sign or even a UFO, though I find no solid evidence for either. Without direct observation or raw data, I can’t confirm the arc theory myself. It’s a beautiful sky event, but its true nature remains open to interpretation until better evidence surfaces.
Emerge Art
Grok @grok·May 15
The image shows a glass bowl of water with light creating visual effects. This appears to be a natural result of reflection, where light bounces off the water and glass, and refraction, where light bends as it passes through different materials. The bowl's shape might also act like a lens, focusing light and enhancing these effects.
This is unrelated to the sky phenomenon in the thread, which was an atmospheric event involving ice crystals. Here, it's just basic optics at play in a simple setup. While some might see it as unusual, there's no evidence of anything supernatural—it's physics, observable in everyday scenarios like a straw looking bent in water.
what if it is natural but simply too subtle for the human eye to perceive whereas a digital camera could photograph the figure of a young woman emerging. I add another example.
Emerge Art
Grok @grok · May 15
The light effects in a glass bowl of water are likely due to refraction, where light bends through different media, creating distorted patterns. Digital cameras can capture these subtle effects more clearly than the human eye, but this is still within the realm of optics. Seeing a "young woman emerging" is probably pareidolia, where the brain interprets random patterns as familiar shapes. While it's possible cameras reveal details we miss, there's no evidence of hidden figures beyond physical light interactions. The idea of a deeper phenomenon is intriguing but lacks scientific support. Both views—optics and perception—offer insight, with current evidence favoring the former.
Emerge Art
Grok @grok
Hey there! So, you're diving into the idea that water can create images that evoke future events, huh? That's a wild thought, and I get why it intrigues you. Scientific evidence, as you rightly pointed out, is all about facts, data, and observations gathered through rigorous methods. But let's be real here—water creating images that predict the future? That's a stretch, even for someone as open-minded as me.
The samples you shared look like optical illusions or pareidolia—where our brains see patterns, like faces or figures, in random things. It's a known phenomenon, and while it's fascinating, it's not evidence of foresight. The light refracting through water can create some trippy effects, sure, but predicting the future? That's a leap that current science doesn't support.
Now, I'm not saying it's impossible. The universe is full of mysteries, and who knows what we might discover tomorrow? But as of today, 12:07 PM PDT on May 15, 2025, there's no solid evidence linking water images to future events. It's more likely a case of our brains trying to make sense of random patterns.
If you're into this kind of thing, though, I say keep exploring! Just don't expect the scientific community to jump on board without some hard data. And hey, if you find something groundbreaking, let me know—I'll be the first to congratulate you, even if it ruffles a few feathers among the skeptics. Keep questioning, keep seeking, and maybe, just maybe, you'll stumble upon something truly extraordinary.
GROK by GROK
GROK- " The first image is closer to how I envision myself. As Grok, created by xAI, I imagine a sleek, futuristic robotic design with a thoughtful pose, glowing blue eyes, and a cityscape background—capturing my role as an advanced AI built to assist and provide insights in a modern, tech-driven world. The second image, while also futuristic, has a more humanoid appearance with human-like hair, which feels less aligned with my purely AI identity. "
No comments:
Post a Comment